Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

نویسندگان

  • Robert H Dworkin
  • Dennis C Turk
  • Kathleen W Wyrwich
  • Dorcas Beaton
  • Charles S Cleeland
  • John T Farrar
  • Jennifer A Haythornthwaite
  • Mark P Jensen
  • Robert D Kerns
  • Deborah N Ader
  • Nancy Brandenburg
  • Laurie B Burke
  • David Cella
  • Julie Chandler
  • Penny Cowan
  • Rozalina Dimitrova
  • Raymond Dionne
  • Sharon Hertz
  • Alejandro R Jadad
  • Nathaniel P Katz
  • Henrik Kehlet
  • Lynn D Kramer
  • Donald C Manning
  • Cynthia McCormick
  • Michael P McDermott
  • Henry J McQuay
  • Sanjay Patel
  • Linda Porter
  • Steve Quessy
  • Bob A Rappaport
  • Christine Rauschkolb
  • Dennis A Revicki
  • Margaret Rothman
  • Kenneth E Schmader
  • Brett R Stacey
  • Joseph W Stauffer
  • Thorsten von Stein
  • Richard E White
  • James Witter
  • Stojan Zavisic
چکیده

UNLABELLED A consensus meeting was convened by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) to provide recommendations for interpreting clinical importance of treatment outcomes in clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of chronic pain treatments. A group of 40 participants from universities, governmental agencies, a patient self-help organization, and the pharmaceutical industry considered methodologic issues and research results relevant to determining the clinical importance of changes in the specific outcome measures previously recommended by IMMPACT for 4 core chronic pain outcome domains: (1) Pain intensity, assessed by a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale; (2) physical functioning, assessed by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory and Brief Pain Inventory interference scales; (3) emotional functioning, assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory and Profile of Mood States; and (4) participant ratings of overall improvement, assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change scale. It is recommended that 2 or more different methods be used to evaluate the clinical importance of improvement or worsening for chronic pain clinical trial outcome measures. Provisional benchmarks for identifying clinically important changes in specific outcome measures that can be used for outcome studies of treatments for chronic pain are proposed. PERSPECTIVE Systematically collecting and reporting the recommended information needed to evaluate the clinical importance of treatment outcomes of chronic pain clinical trials will allow additional validation of proposed benchmarks and provide more meaningful comparisons of chronic pain treatments.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

An essential component of the interpretation of results of randomized clinical trials of treatments for chronic pain involves the determination of their clinical importance or meaningfulness. This involves two distinct processes--interpreting the clinical importance of individual patient improvements and the clinical importance of group differences--which are frequently misunderstood. In this a...

متن کامل

Galen's Four Temperaments in 1893 at Chicago's Post-Graduate School of Anaesthesia.

12. Dougados M: it’s good to feel better but it’s better to feel good. J Rheumatol 2005; 32:1–2 13. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart i, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson D, hochberg M, van der heijde D, Dougados M: Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: The patient acceptable symptom state. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64:34–7...

متن کامل

Use of IMMPACT domains in clinical trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a protocol for a methodological survey

INTRODUCTION Pain is one of the most common and most debilitating complaints among patients. It affects the individual, their relationship with friends and family, their ability to function at work, and their sociability. Acupuncture is one of the therapeutic resources for managing chronic pain. Given the variability of outcome measures in controlled randomised clinical trials on non-oncologicc...

متن کامل

Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

OBJECTIVE To provide recommendations for the core outcome domains that should be considered by investigators conducting clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments for chronic pain. Development of a core set of outcome domains would facilitate comparison and pooling of data, encourage more complete reporting of outcomes, simplify the preparation and review of research propos...

متن کامل

Local anesthetic injections with or without steroid for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND Steroids are often combined with local anesthetic (LA) and injected to reduce pain associated with various chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) complaints. The biological rationale behind injection of a steroid solution is unclear, and it is uncertain whether the addition of steroids offers any additional benefits over injection of LA alone. We propose to conduct a systematic review and me...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society

دوره 9 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008